Jug r 1

Jug r 1 Scientific Information
Type: Component
Name; WHO/IUIS: Jug r 1
Biological function: 2S Albumin, a storage protein.
Molecular Weight: 12-15 kDa
Route of Exposure: Ingestion
Source Material: Walnut allergen components
Allergen code: f441

Summary

Jug r 1 is heat resistant 2S albumin storage protein, like allergens in pecan nut, which is also digestion stable. Sensitization to 2S albumins is through the gastrointestinal tract. High stability and structural resistance due to cysteine residues make it sustainable in the gastrointestinal tract's harsh acidic environment. Hence, they can cross the gut mucosal barrier, can present to the immune system, and trigger allergic responses. sIgE to Jug r 1 is strongly associated with primary walnut and pecan nut allergy and systemic symptoms risk. Jug r 1 sensitization has a high prevalence in children from Northern Italy, showing that 71.4 % of cases were positive for Jug r 1, leading to anaphylaxis. A study found that the concentration of Jug r 1-sIgE was higher than other components from walnut. Jug r 1 is small and occurs in large amounts in many edible trees which act as seed storage proteins. The specificity of recombinant protein (r Jug r 1) to IgE are possible markers to detect severity and persistence. Another study with pediatric subjects found anaphylaxis, angioedema, and urticarial to be major symptoms. IgE for walnut Jug r 1 protein was found in 96.9 % of cases. IgE binding in storage proteins of Juglans species is weak and not able to cross-react with Jug r 1 or Jug r 2. Peanut allergens like Ara h 1, 2 and 3 are homologous to Jug r 1, r 3, and r 4 from walnut, respectively.

References
  1. Burney P, Potts J, Kummeling I, Mills E, Clausen M, Dubakiene R, et al. The prevalence and distribution of food sensitization in E uropean adults. Allergy. 2014;69(3):365-71.
  2. Ballmer-Weber BK, Lidholm J, Lange L, Pascal M, Lang C, Gernert S, et al. Allergen recognition patterns in walnut allergy are age dependent and correlate with the severity of allergic reactions. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2019;7(5):1560-7. e6.
  3. Lee J, Jeong K, Jeon S-a, Lee S. Component resolved diagnosis of walnut allergy in young children: Jug r 1 as a major walnut allergen. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology. 2019.
  4. Ciprandi G, Pistorio A, Silvestri M, Rossi GA, Tosca MA. Walnut anaphylaxis: the usefulness of molecular-based allergy diagnostics. Immunology letters. 2014;161(1):138-9.
  5. Jeong K, Lee SY, Ahn K, Kim J, Lee HR, Suh DI, et al. A multicenter study on anaphylaxis caused by peanut, tree nuts, and seeds in children and adolescents. Allergy. 2017;72(3):507-10.
  6. Sato S, Yamamoto M, Yanagida N, Ito K, Ohya Y, Imai T, et al. Jug r 1 sensitization is important in walnut-allergic children and youth. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2017;5(6):1784-6. e1.
  7. Sordet C, Culerrier R, Granier C, Rancé F, Didier A, Barre A, et al. Expression of Jug r 1, the 2S albumin allergen from walnut (Juglans regia), as a correctly folded and functional recombinant protein. Peptides. 2009;30(7):1213-21.
  8. Rasi Varaee FS, Gholamin M, Vakili Moghadam M, Mohammadi M, Mokhtarian K, Jafari R, et al. Cloning and Expression of 2S Albumin As a Major Allergen of Persian Walnut. Immunoregulation. 2020;3(1):51-60.
  9. Costa J, Carrapatoso I, Oliveira M, Mafra I. Walnut allergens: molecular characterization, detection and clinical relevance. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. 2014;44(3):319-41.
  10. Comstock S, McGranahan G, Peterson W, Teuber SS. Extensive in vitro cross‐reactivity to seed storage proteins is present among walnut (Juglans) cultivars and species. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. 2004;34(10):1583-90.
  11. Rosenfeld L, Shreffler W, Bardina L, Niggemann B, Wahn U, Sampson HA, et al. Walnut allergy in peanut-allergic patients: significance of sequential epitopes of walnut homologous to linear epitopes of Ara h 1, 2 and 3 in relation to clinical reactivity. International archives of allergy and immunology. 2012;157(3):238-45.
  12. Elizur A, Appel MY, Nachshon L, Levy MB, Epstein-Rigbi Na, Pontoppidan B, et al. Walnut oral immunotherapy for desensitisation of walnut and additional tree nut allergies (Nut CRACKER): a single-centre, prospective cohort study. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2019;3(5):312-21.
  13. Robotham JM, Hoffman GG, Teuber SS, Beyer K, Sampson HA, Sathe SK, et al. Linear IgE-epitope mapping and comparative structural homology modeling of hazelnut and English walnut 11S globulins. Molecular immunology. 2009;46(15):2975-84.
  14. Guo X, Jiang S, Li X, Yang S, Cheng L, Qiu J, et al. Sequence analysis of digestion-resistant peptides may be an efficient strategy for studying the linear epitopes of Jug r 1, the major walnut allergen. Food Chemistry. 2020:126711.
  15. Downs ML, Semic-Jusufagic A, Simpson A, Bartra J, Fernandez-Rivas M, Rigby NM, et al. Characterization of low molecular weight allergens from English walnut (Juglans regia). Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2014;62(48):11767-75.
  16. Mew R, Borres M, Sjölander S, du Toit G. A retrospect study into the utility of allergen components in walnut allergy. Pediatric allergy and immunology: official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology. 2016;27(7):750.
  17. Weinberger T, Sicherer S. Current perspectives on tree nut allergy: a review. Journal of asthma and allergy. 2018;11:41.
  18. Treudler R. Update on in vitro allergy diagnostics. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. 2012;10(2):89-99.